Baltimore Line Handling Co. v. Brophy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Iqbal is “relevant to the default judgment inquiry”
• “The record lacks any specific allegations of fact that ‘show’ why those conclusions are warranted.”
• “The record lacks any specific allegations of facts that ‘show’ why those conclusions are warranted.”
• “The record lacks any specific allegations of facts that ‘show’ why those conclusions are warranted.”
• “The record lacks any specific allegations of fact that ‘show’ why those conclusions are warranted.”
• “The record lacks any specific allegations of fact that ‘show’ why those conclusions are warranted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).