Skip to main content
· 1/8/1986

Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Service Commission

Citations

  • 501 A.2d 1307
  • 305 Md. 145
  • 1986 Md. LEXIS 177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the contemporaneous interpretation of a statute soon after its enactment by an agency tasked with its implementation is entitled to at least some weight in construing the statute
  • finding rulemaking unnecessary because the adjudication was not one “in which materially modified or new standards were applied retroactively to the detriment of a company that had relied upon the Commission’s past pronouncements”
  • finding rulemaking unnecessary because the adjudication was not one \in which materially modified or new standards were applied retroactively to the detriment of a company that had relied upon the Commission's past pronouncements\
  • “[A] provision contained within an integrated statutory scheme must be understood in that context and harmonized to the extent possible with other provisions of the statutory scheme”
  • \[A] provision contained within an integrated statutory scheme must be understood in that context and harmonized to the extent possible with other provisions of the statutory scheme\
  • “[A] provision contained within an integrated statutory scheme must be understood in that context and harmonized to the extent possible with other provisions of the statutory scheme”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.