Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a requirement that an agency should protect “consumer interests” is merely a “boilerplate truism” and not a “discretion-restricting guideline”
• holding that “FERC’s decision to settle its enforcement action against Columbia was within the agency’s nonreviewable discretion”
• “The ban on judicial review of actions ‘committed to agency discretion by law’ [under 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(2
• “The ban on judicial review of action ‘committed to agency discretion by law’ is jurisdictional.”
• decision to settle an action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).