· 5/7/1975
Baltimore County v. Stitzel
Citations
- 337 A.2d 721
- 26 Md. App. 175
- 1975 Md. App. LEXIS 463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating, in dicta, that if one defendant pays more than his pro rata share, he becomes entitled to judgment for such sum notwithstanding the fact that defendant has filed no cross-claim in the original proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.