Skip to main content
· 9/2/2004

Baltimore City Police Department v. State

Citations

  • 857 A.2d 148
  • 158 Md. App. 274
  • 2004 Md. App. LEXIS 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Kirwan, and holding that police internal affairs records are “personnel records” within the meaning of § 10-616
  • applying Kirwan, and holding that police internal affairs records are \personnel records\ within the meaning of § 10-616
  • describing process for in camera inspection of confidential records, followed by opportunity to proffer need for disclosure
  • describing procedure for in camera review of law enforcement officer’s personnel file to determine what, if any, portion of it should be made available to a defendant in a criminal case
  • describing procedure for in camera review of law enforcement officer’s personnel file to determine what, if any, portion of it should be made available to a defendant in a criminal case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Krauser, Barbera

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.