Skip to main content
· 10/21/1998

Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Company v. Wisconsin Central Limited

Citations

  • 154 F.3d 404
  • 1998 WL 531357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that court “would relieve the parties of their waiver” if primary jurisdiction doctrine were “of transcendent importance” to administration of statute
  • noting an appellate court may only reverse a district court's ruling on a demand for arbitration when the district court acts unreasonably
  • “A dismissal with leave to reinstate is not appealable as a final order….”
  • the doctrine “presupposes that the court ... has jurisdiction”
  • adopting today’s result for pre-existing suits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Bauer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.