Balthazar v. Mari Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Illinois tax delinquency statutes allow all real estate owners to recover the surplus value of their land.”
• “[T]he Illinois tax delinquency statutes allow all real estate owners to recover the surplus value of their land.”
• “Rather than taking private property for a public purpose, Illinois is here collecting taxes which are admittedly overdue.”
• “Rather than taking private property for a public purpose, Illinois is here collecting taxes which are admittedly overdue.”
• tax sale does not improperly place public burden on private individual

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rosewell v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-01-20· cited 46×
• City of Auburn v. Mandarelli
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1974-05-15· cited 40×
• McKeever v. McClandon (In Re McKeever)
  N.D. Illinois· 1991-10-29· cited 34×
• McCormick v. First National Bank of Miami
  S.D. Florida· 1971-02-05· cited 31×
• Sheehan v. County of Suffolk
  New York Court of Appeals· 1986-02-13· cited 31×
• Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-06-09· cited 20×
• In re Application of the County Collector
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 20×
• Coleman v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2014-09-30· cited 17×
• Catoor v. Blair
  N.D. Illinois· 1973-04-20· cited 16×
• Smith v. D. R. G., Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-06-17· cited 13×
• Collector of Revenue of the City of St. Louis v. Parcels of Land Encumbered with Delinquent Tax Liens
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1979-09-11· cited 11×
• Continental Resources v. Fair
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2022-03-18· cited 7×
• In Re Application of County Collector
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 2×
• Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10, Assessed to Spitz
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-06-09· cited 2×
• Rafaeli LLC v. Oakland County
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2020-07-17
• 257-261 20th Avenue Realty, LLC v. Alessandro Roberto
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2025-01-09

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 1,797×
• Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Chicago
  Supreme Court· 1897-03-01· cited 1,229×
• United States v. Miller
  Supreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 1,218×
• Bell's Gap Railroad v. Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court· 1890-03-10· cited 449×
• Nelson v. City of New York
  Supreme Court· 1956-12-10· cited 164×
• Brown v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1923-11-12· cited 160×
• Cincinnati v. Vester
  Supreme Court· 1930-05-19· cited 126×
• Georgia Railroad & Banking v. Redwine
  Supreme Court· 1952-01-28· cited 125×
• City of Cincinnati v. Vester. Same v. Richards Same v. Reakirt
  Supreme Court· 1930-05-19· cited 106×
• Kentucky Union Co. v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1911-01-03· cited 88×
• Schneider v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 1953-11-05· cited 30×

Other cases named Balthazar v. Mari Ltd.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Balthazar v. Mari Ltd.
  Supreme Court· 1969-12-08· cited 32×