Skip to main content
· 1/4/1897

Balph v. Liberty National Bank

Citations

  • 179 Pa. 430
  • 36 A. 337
  • 1897 Pa. LEXIS 661

Syllabus

<p>Contract — Building contract — Architect—Charge of the court — Question j or jury.</p> <p>Where A gave a general contract to do certain work and afterwards knew that B, a stranger to the contract, was doing part of the work which A’s architect testified was done under a contract made by him with B by authority from A, and A denied having given such authority, and alleged that he thought B was doing the work under the general contractors, it is proper for the court to charge that i£ the architect was authorized to make the contract with B for and on behalf of A, or if A subsequently ratified the act of the architect, A would be liable; or if the contract was not expressly ratified and A, knowing that his architect had assumed to act for him, stood by and permitted B to do the work and expend money upon it, he would be estopped from denying the contract.</p>

Judges: Fell, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.