Skip to main content
· 9/14/1989

Baloise Ins. Co., Ltd. v. United Airlines, Inc.

Citations

  • 723 F. Supp. 195
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10899
  • 1989 WL 127614

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant carrier “should not be treated as a warehouseman simply because it stores goods temporarily in a warehouse facility prior to transport.”
  • distinguishing Information Control where carrier was under no obligation to follow specific route
  • carrier should not be treated as a warehouseman \simply because it stores goods temporarily in a warehouse facility prior to transport\
  • “Absent some affirmative proof of conversion, courts applying federal common law will enforce a contractual limitation of liability provision.”
  • “When a bailee commits the intentional tort of conversion, courts will not enforce limitation of liability provisions on grounds of public policy.”
  • “It is clear that [the conversion claim in] this case is governed by the federal rule. Federal common law governs a carrier’s liability for the loss of goods during interstate shipment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.