· 11/7/1958
Balogh v. Jewelers Mutual Insurance Co.
Citations
- 167 F. Supp. 763
- 1958 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3471
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that mysterious disappearance exclusion did not apply because insurer did not establish that cause of loss was a mysterious disappearance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lieb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.