Skip to main content
· 11/14/2005

Balm v. Salliemae Servicing Corp. (Balm)

Citations

  • 333 B.R. 443
  • 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2178
  • 2005 WL 3082780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to consider any potential child support income as a future financial resource because it would be speculative and support funds were arguably for the child's needs, not the parent's student loan payments
  • refusing to consider any potential child support income as a future financial resource because it would be speculative and support funds were arguably for the child's needs, not the parent’s student loan payments
  • refusing to consider any potential child support income as a future financial resource because it would be speculative and support funds were arguably for the child’s needs, not the parent’s student loan payments
  • refusing to consider any potential child support income for debtor’s daughter as a future financial resource because to do so would be speculative and support funds were arguably for child’s needs, not student loan payments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul J. Kilburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.