· 11/14/2005
Balm v. Salliemae Servicing Corp. (Balm)
Citations
- 333 B.R. 443
- 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2178
- 2005 WL 3082780
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to consider any potential child support income as a future financial resource because it would be speculative and support funds were arguably for the child's needs, not the parent's student loan payments
- refusing to consider any potential child support income as a future financial resource because it would be speculative and support funds were arguably for the child's needs, not the parent’s student loan payments
- refusing to consider any potential child support income as a future financial resource because it would be speculative and support funds were arguably for the child’s needs, not the parent’s student loan payments
- refusing to consider any potential child support income for debtor’s daughter as a future financial resource because to do so would be speculative and support funds were arguably for child’s needs, not student loan payments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paul J. Kilburg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.