BALLY'S GRAND HOTEL & CASINO v. Reeves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a remand to an agency for calculation of benefits due does not require further substantive action or change the decision that benefits are owed, the district court's decision on the petition for judicial review is final and appealable
• indicating that avoiding piecemeal appellate review promotes judicial economy
• “ ‘This court has consistently looked past labels in interpreting NRAP 3A(b)(l
• “ ‘This court has consistently looked past labels in interpreting NRAP 3A(b)(l), and has instead taken a functional view of finality, which seeks to further the rule’s main objective: promoting judicial economy by avoiding the specter of piecemeal appellate review.’ ”
• a district court order concluding that appellant was entitled to benefits but remanding for the calculation of benefits was a final, appealable order because it finally resolved the substantive issue presented—whether appellant was entitled to benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).