Skip to main content
· 4/10/2012

Ballou v. LAW OFFICES HOWARD LEE SCHIFF

Citations

  • 39 A.3d 1075
  • 304 Conn. 348
  • 2012 WL 1070014
  • 2012 Conn. LEXIS 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[e]ach of these terms [installment payment order and money judgment] has a distinct meaning for purposes of the relevant statutory scheme”
  • ‘‘under § 37-3a (a), an interest rate of less than 10 percent is presumptively valid, and therefore will be upheld, unless the party challenging the rate set by the court can demonstrate that it represents an abuse of discretion’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.