Ballinger v. Culotta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the Rooker-Feldman doctrine prohibits a lawsuit brought in federal district court alleging a state court wrongly decided custody issues and unconstitutionally infringed on the plaintiff’s rights
• a federal district court lacks jurisdiction to consider a claim which “in effect constitutes a challenge to a state court decision”
• \We may affirm the district court's judgment on any ground supported by the record.\
• a federal district court lacks jurisdiction to consider a 3 See generally Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 416 (1923), and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).