Ballin v. Apperson Realty Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting different doctrinal origins of accrual rules for ordinary negligence and for malpractice
• “[I]t would be unreasonable and perhaps unconstitutional to hold that [plaintiff’s] time to sue expired before it was possible for him to learn of the wrong....”
• “the wrong itself is not actionable, the right not violated, and the cause of action nonexistent until damage takes place.”
• action based on negligence and implied warranty for product inserted into plaintiff’s sinuses to make them perceptible in x-rays accrued when “forces wrongfully put in motion produce injury,” not when injury became known
• which specifically eschewed any extension of accrual on discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).