Skip to main content
· 9/15/1995

Balletti v. Sun-Sentinel Co.

Citations

  • 909 F. Supp. 1539
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15288
  • 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,031
  • 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1341
  • 1995 WL 750391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a six-month interval between complaint and discharge could not support an inference of causal connection, and cataloguing cases holding that intervals of as little as three months, standing alone, cannot support such an inference
  • stating that “the court may consider whether, as well as the manner in which, the plaintiff registered her complaint”
  • holding plaintiff’s participation in sexual banter and belated reporting was ‘fatal to her claims’ because she could not clearly show that she clearly made her co-workers aware that the conduct was unwelcome
  • no causal connection after three months lapsed between protected expression and adverse action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seltzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.