Ballentine v. Bardwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that penalty provision of section 10 — 4 applies to violations of section 10 — 5 of the Code
• Election Code's simultaneous filing requirement was directory: the provision did not contain a result that would follow if the requirement was not met
• Election Code’s simultaneous filing requirement was directory: the provision did not contain a result that would follow if the requirement was not met
• in the absence of an applicable strict compliance provision, candidates’ names may appear on ballot despite violation of section 10 — 5 of the Code
• Election Code's simultaneous filing requirement was directory: the provision did not contain a result that would follow if the requirement was not met
• appellate court cannot restrict or enlarge the plain meaning of an unambiguous statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).