Skip to main content
· 1/15/1886

Ballard v. Cheney

Citations

  • 19 Neb. 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting apellant's failure to explain how its stated objective would apply to its proposed classification
  • dissent, Wright, J., criticizing the majority’s failure to consider whether severed portion could stand alone

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Other, Reese

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.