Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 8/10/1989

Ballard v. Carlson

Citations

  • 882 F.2d 93
  • 1989 WL 88953

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that courts have “the power to order dismissal of an action for failure to comply with court orders’
  • holding that district court’s dismissal following an explicit and reasonable warning was not an abuse of discretion
  • holding that district court’s dismissal following an explicit and reasonable warning was not an abuse of discretion
  • recognizing that courts have the authority to order dismissal of an action for failure to comply with court orders
  • holding that district court’s dismissal following an explicit and reasonable warning was not an abuse of discretion
  • holding that district court’s dismissal following an explicit and reasonable warning was not an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chapman, Powell, Supreme, Widener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Ballard v. Carlson

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.