Skip to main content
· 1/8/1996

Ballantyne v. Ballantyne

Citations

  • 666 So. 2d 957
  • 1996 WL 4907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a marital settlement agreement entered into and ratified by a trial court is subject to interpretation like any other contract
  • holding a marital settlement agreement should not be disturbed unless it is “found to be ambiguous or in need of clarification, modification, or interpretation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.