· 1/8/1996
Ballantyne v. Ballantyne
Citations
- 666 So. 2d 957
- 1996 WL 4907
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a marital settlement agreement entered into and ratified by a trial court is subject to interpretation like any other contract
- holding a marital settlement agreement should not be disturbed unless it is “found to be ambiguous or in need of clarification, modification, or interpretation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.