Ballanger v. Johanns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claimants must present all issues with the NAD before raising them on judicial review
• finding that claimant had failed to exhaust with the NAD certain issues he was raising before the court
• “We must defer to the agency’s interpretation of the statute it is charged with enforcing unless that interpretation is contrary to the statute’s unambiguous meaning.”
• “[I]ssue exhaustion is required, and we need not address the arguments that [petitioner] failed to specifically present to the agency.”
• “We need not consider arguments the parties failed to raise before the agency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).