Skip to main content
· 4/16/1964

Ball v. Mudge

Citations

  • 391 P.2d 201
  • 64 Wash. 2d 247
  • 1964 Wash. LEXIS 324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering a claim for “negligence by defendant Carl E. Mudge in failing to successfully sterilize Mr. Ball in a vasectomy”
  • early decisions denied recovery reasoning that benefits of having healthy child outweighted detriments as matter of law
  • early decisions denied recovery reasoning that benefits of having healthy child outweighted detriments as matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.