Ball v. McDowell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on an untimely motion to alter or amend
• holding that a final judgment leaves “nothing for the trial court to adjudicate.”
• stating that a final judgment “is one that resolves all of the parties’ claims and leaves the court with nothing to adjudicate”
• stating that a final judgment “is one that resolves all of the parties’ claims and leaves the court with nothing to adjudicate”
• explaining that a final judgment resolves all of the parties’ claims and leaves the court with nothing to adjudicate
• noting that both the first and second judgments complied with Rule 58

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).