Ball v. KOTTER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jurors’ lay knowledge would not necessarily have extended to professional conduct rules governing conflicts of interest and controlling case law
• recognizing general requirement under Illinois law
• \Plaintiff's claim for breach of fiduciary duty . . . does not fail for want of expert testimony.\
• “To disqualify a witness as directly interested in the action, the witness’s interest in the judgment must be such that a pecuniary gain or loss will come to the witness directly as the immediate result of the judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).