Ball v. Kehl
Citations
- 87 Cal. 505
- 25 P. 679
- 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1012
Syllabus
<p>Water Rights — Appropriation for Special Use — Rights of Subsequent Appropriator—Temporary Diversion—Injunction—Insufficient Findings. — In an action by a subsequent appropriator of water for purposes of irrigation and domestic use, to restrain its diversion when not needed by a prior appropriator for mill purposes, an allegation that the defendant was continuing, and that he threatened to continue, to divert the water, when not needed for mill purposes, is material; and a finding that on a certain day the defendant deprived the plaintiff of the use of the water is insufficient to sustain an injunction, without a finding as to how long the deprivation continued, or as to whether the defendant threatened to continue it.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an attorney violated Rule 1.16 (d) by failing to refund a fee that had not 15 been earned
- agreeing with special master’s report that determined, in part, that an attorney violated Rule 1.16 (d) by failing to refund an unearned fee
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haven
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.