Skip to main content
· 6/18/1992

Ball Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Xidex Corporation and Dysan Corporation, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants

Citations

  • 967 F.2d 1440
  • 22 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1366
  • 23 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1214
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “that private lawyers are 26 entitled to absolute immunity from charges of defamation based on statements in the quasi- judicial setting of PTO proceedings”
  • reasoning that plaintiff was not prejudiced when a defendant asserted for the first time an affirmative defense in a motion for summary judgment at least three months prior to trial
  • con- cluding that raising the affirmative defense of collateral estoppel in a summary judgment motion three months before trial was sufficient to not prejudice the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKay, Aldisert, McWilliams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.