Skip to main content
· 7/7/1989

Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. And Ball & Brosamer (Jv) v. The United States

Citations

  • 878 F.2d 1426
  • 35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,681
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9716
  • 1989 WL 73349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an official whose responsibility is limited to financial aspects of a contractor’s affairs is not the proper person to certify a claim
  • holding that an official whose responsibility is limited to financial aspects of a contractor's affairs is not the proper person to certify a claim
  • holding the regulation “unambiguous” and directing, that it be applied “as written”
  • holding the regulation \unambiguous\ and directing that it be applied \as written\
  • where a claim is not properly certified, there is no valid claim for a contracting officer to decide
  • “Unless the contractor has submitted a properly certified claim to the contracting officer, there is no valid claim, the denial of which is an appeal-able decision of the contracting officer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedman, Rich, Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.