Skip to main content
· 10/23/2001

Balkar Dhillon v. Crown Controls Corporation

Citations

  • 269 F.3d 865
  • 57 Fed. R. Serv. 1438
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22715
  • 2001 WL 1263588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An expert must testify to something more than what is ‘obvious to the layperson’ in order to be of any particular assistance to the jury.”
  • without a detailed explanation of methodology, a court cannot assess the reliability of the testimony
  • “the district court was well within bounds” to exclude “commonsense” expert testimony
  • “the district court was well within bounds” to exclude “commonsense” expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Ripple, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.