· 10/23/2001
Balkar Dhillon v. Crown Controls Corporation
Citations
- 269 F.3d 865
- 57 Fed. R. Serv. 1438
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22715
- 2001 WL 1263588
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An expert must testify to something more than what is ‘obvious to the layperson’ in order to be of any particular assistance to the jury.”
- without a detailed explanation of methodology, a court cannot assess the reliability of the testimony
- “the district court was well within bounds” to exclude “commonsense” expert testimony
- “the district court was well within bounds” to exclude “commonsense” expert testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Ripple, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.