Balfour v. Wilkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Board erred in relying on inadequate 1997 examination to deny rating increase when 1995 examination, inter alia, supported requested rating
• reversing when facts as found by the BVA provided “no other permissible view of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).