Nebraska Supreme Court· 11/1/1991
Balfany v. Balfany
Citations
- 476 N.W.2d 681
- 239 Neb. 391
- 1991 Neb. LEXIS 357
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting Wilharms to find violation of temporary restraining order alone is insufficient to support constructive trust over property subject to the order
- considering whether “violation of a restraining order, standing alone, is [ ]sufficient for imposition of a constructive trust on property which is subject to the restraining order”
- order sustaining demurrer and order of dismissal affirmed after plaintiff elected to stand on pleadings rather than amend
- “violation of a restraining order, standing alone, is insufficient for imposition of a constructive trust on property which is subject to the restraining order”
- violation of a restraining order, standing alone, is insufficient for imposition of a constructive trust on property which is subject to the restraining order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lawry v. County of SarpyNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-03-13· cited 61×
- Nicholas v. NicholasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-01-30· cited 57×
- Hamilton v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-04-16· cited 36×
- In Re Estate of StephensonNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-07-30· cited 23×
- Rick D. Lange v. Robert C. SchroppEighth Circuit· 2007-08-06· cited 20×
- American Family Life Insurance Co. v. NorukCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-03-07· cited 19×
- In Re Rine & Rine Auctioneers, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1996-01-22· cited 17×
- Kaiman v. Mercy Midlands Medical & Dental PlanNebraska Court of Appeals· 1992-05-19· cited 16×
- Speer v. DealyNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-02-26· cited 11×
- Lange v. Schropp (In Re Brook Valley IV)Eighth Circuit· 2006-08-15· cited 10×
- Fulk v. McLellanNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-04-02· cited 8×
- Wichman v. NaylorNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-08-14· cited 8×
- Metrejean v. GunterNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-03-06· cited 7×
- Pope v. CauffmanD. Kansas· 1995-03-23· cited 4×
- Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. NBD Bank, N.A.E.D. Michigan· 1995-06-12· cited 3×
- Crow v. GiebelhausNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 3×
- Kimberlee Ann Nelson v. Lynette NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-07-15· cited 3×
- Carlson v. ChainNebraska Court of Appeals· 1992-09-29· cited 2×
- Natkin & Company v. Richard D. MyersEighth Circuit· 1996-01-22· cited 2×
- Kaiman v. MERCY MIDLANDS MED. & DENTAL PLANNebraska Court of Appeals· 1992-05-19
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gottsch v. Bank of StapletonNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-07-20· cited 159×
- Kracl v. LosekeNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-10-05· cited 93×
- Wilharms v. WilharmsWisconsin Supreme Court· 1980-02-07· cited 61×
- Bert Cattle Co., Inc. v. WarrenNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-07-19· cited 59×
- Ford v. JordanNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-07-19· cited 45×
- Security Investment Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-03-24· cited 43×
- Knoell v. HuffNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-11-07· cited 33×
- In Re Estate of LienemannNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-03-07· cited 27×
- Christopher v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-01-11· cited 21×
- Mullikin v. PedersenNebraska Supreme Court· 1955-07-15· cited 16×
- Schuyler State Bank v. CechNebraska Supreme Court· 1988-05-20· cited 14×
- Weiner v. HazerNebraska Supreme Court· 1988-10-07· cited 14×
- Nelson v. CoolNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-01-13· cited 9×
- Malec v. MalecNebraska Supreme Court· 1976-07-14· cited 9×
- Preferred Pictures Corp. v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1960-07-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.