Skip to main content
· 10/2/2009

Balen v. Holland America Line Inc.

Citations

  • 583 F.3d 647
  • 187 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2145
  • 2009 A.M.C. 2561
  • 15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 609
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21632
  • 2009 WL 3152398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assessing appeal of motion to compel arbitration 5 under Rule 12(b)(3)
  • “Review under the clearly erroneous standard is significantly deferential, requiring a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • affirming 8 motion to compel arbitration under Rule 12(b)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wardlaw, Paez, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.