Baldwin v. Upper Valley Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that standard for IIED is objective and there was no outrageous conduct where plaintiff simply made vague assertions about employer’s motives for his dismissal
• “Opposing allegations must have sufficient support in specific facts to create a genuine issue of material fact.”
• \Opposing allegations must have sufficient support in specific facts to create a genuine issue of material fact.\
• cautioning trial courts not to dismiss self-serving affidavits on summary judgment because they often require factual determinations
• rejecting plaintiffs claim that court inappropriately assessed motivations and perceptions of defendant because plaintiff could not provide, beyond his personal belief of motive, any evidence of defendant’s intentionally oppressive behavior
• summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party it entitled to judgment as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).