Baldwin v. Stebbins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• parties \in a highly regulated field such as FCC licensing can have no distinct investment-backed expectations that include a reliance upon a legislative and regulatory status quo\
• “When considering a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the court may examine relevant evidence in order to resolve any factual disputes”
• parties “in a highly regulated field such as FCC licensing can have no distinct investment-backed expectations that include a reliance upon a legislative and regulatory status quo”
• parties “in a highly regulated field such as FCC licensing can have no distinct investment-backed expectations that include a reliance upon a legislative and regulatory status quo”
• “To the extent that plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment on the constitutionality of [a federal statute], this court is not the proper forum to render such a pronouncement.” (citing King and Adair)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).