Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 5/30/2001
Baldwin v. State
Citations
- 45 S.W.3d 412
- 74 Ark. App. 69
- 2001 Ark. App. LEXIS 432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- specifically rejecting a “substantial compliance” approach to Rule 9 appeals
- specifically rejecting a “substantial compliance” approach to Rule 9 appeals
- specifically rejecting a “substantial compliance” approach to Rule 9 appeals
- specifically rejecting a \substantial compliance\ approach to Rule 9 appeals
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Terry Crabtree
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-06-24· cited 29×
- Velek v. State (City of Little Rock)Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-01-12· cited 19×
- McNabb v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-09-07· cited 19×
- J&M Mobile Homes, Inc. v. HamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2001-12-06· cited 18×
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2002-06-19· cited 11×
- Motor Cars of Nashville, Inc. v. ChronisterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-08-27· cited 6×
- Johnny Lee Nichols v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2023-01-18· cited 3×
- Rusty L. Latham v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2019-06-05
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.