Baldwin v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating three-judge court’s influence district remedy and remanding for reconsideration in light of amendments to section 2
• vacating three-judge court's influence district remedy and remanding for reconsideration in light of amendments to section 2
• vacating district court judgment and remanding for review of congressional reapportionment plan under the 1982 amendments
• where legislative preference for two minority districts with at least 40% population expressed, court found no constitutional or federal statutory bar thereto
• mere characterization of issue as one of double jeopardy does not require court to grant interlocutory review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).