Baldwin v. Idoni

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]n construing a statutory provision, we first look to its language, and if that language is plain and unambiguous, ‘we need look no further’ ”
• \The fact that one commissioner questioned the existence of an alternative is not equivalent to the commission's finding that no alternative existed.\
• this court has held in certain contexts that it is improper for reviewing court to reverse agency decision simply because agency failed to state reason for decision on record
• plain- tiff meets burden in appeal by establishing ‘‘that sub- stantial evidence does not exist in the record as a whole to support the agency’s decision’’
• ‘‘[a] reviewing court must sustain the agency’s determination if an examination of the record discloses [substantial] evidence that support any one of the reasons given’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• \Rather than asking the reviewing court to retry the case de novo . . . the plaintiff must establish that substantial evidence does not exist in the record as a whole to support the agency's decision. . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).