· 4/22/1872
Baldwin v. Bernard
Citations
- 2 F. Cas. 510
- 9 Blatchf. 509
- 5 Fish. Pat. Cas. 442
- 1872 U.S. App. LEXIS 1179
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding appellant’s contention that her alleged limited education and experience rendered her unable to understand the amount of time for filing an NOA was “at best a garden variety claim of excusable neglect” and refusing to apply equitable tolling
- holding appellant's contention that her alleged limited education and experience rendered her unable to understand the amount of time for filing an NOA was \at best a garden variety claim of excusable neglect\ and refusing to apply equitable tolling
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blatchford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.