Skip to main content
· 4/22/1872

Baldwin v. Bernard

Citations

  • 2 F. Cas. 510
  • 9 Blatchf. 509
  • 5 Fish. Pat. Cas. 442
  • 1872 U.S. App. LEXIS 1179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellant’s contention that her alleged limited education and experience rendered her unable to understand the amount of time for filing an NOA was “at best a garden variety claim of excusable neglect” and refusing to apply equitable tolling
  • holding appellant's contention that her alleged limited education and experience rendered her unable to understand the amount of time for filing an NOA was \at best a garden variety claim of excusable neglect\ and refusing to apply equitable tolling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatchford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.