Baldwin v. Baldwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The denial of FSD's motion to intervene under Rule 52.12(a) is appealable.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• MacK v. MacK
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-09-27· cited 6×
• Lajeunesse v. State, Department of Social Services, Director, Family Support Division
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-10-04· cited 3×
• Florida Department of Revenue v. Collingwood
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-16· cited 1×
• IN THE INTEREST OF S.M.B., Minor, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CHILDREN'S DIVISION v. J.P. and C.P.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-11-13

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blessing v. Freestone
  Supreme Court· 1997-04-21· cited 1,415×
• Kubley v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2004-06-08· cited 28×
• State Ex Rel. Hilburn v. Staeden
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2002-12-24· cited 25×
• Marriage of Chastain v. Chastain
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1996-10-22· cited 24×
• Marriage of Wills v. Wills
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-04-05· cited 19×
• In Re Liquidation of Professional Medical Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2003-01-14· cited 14×
• Shadwick v. Byrd
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-12-07· cited 12×
• Quaker Oats Co. v. Stanton
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-01-31· cited 11×
• In the Interest of S.R.L.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-01-15· cited 7×
• L.B. v. Herman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-11-12· cited 7×
• Smith v. State ex rel. Rambo
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-11-08· cited 2×