Skip to main content

Baldwin v. Baldwin

Citations

  • 603 S.E.2d 172
  • 44 Va. App. 93
  • 2004 Va. App. LEXIS 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “when one of the statutory bars in Code § 20-109 applies, Hardesty requires that the agreement ‘expressly preclude termination of the contractual duty of spousal support’ “
  • “[T]he party asserting the existence of a[] [settlement] agreement bears the burden of persuasion to prove its existence.”
  • “Hardesty can best be understood as recognizing a statutory preset that can be undone only by the clearest possible expression of contractual intent.”
  • “[W]hether a statutory bar to spousal support must be expressly included in the agreement as a ground for termination or expressly excluded depends entirely on whether the agreement predates or postdates the legislative enactment creating the bar.”
  • “[I]n anticipation of divorce, the parties executed a property settlement agreement.
  • “[I]n anticipation of divorce, the parties executed a property settlement agreement.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.