Baldwin-United Corp. v. Named (In Re Baldwin-United Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• which declined to follow Frenville because of “the Court’s failure to distinguish between ‘claim’ as defined in 11 U.S.C. § 101(4
• creditors could not commence or continue any third-party suits for contribution without first seeking determination from bankruptcy court as to applicability of stay
• automatic stay applied to post-petition claim for contribution or indemnity based on pre-petition conduct
• definition of claim is “all encompassing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).