Baldus v. Members of the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[i]n light of the express disclosures in the Mortgage giving MERS the authority to act on behalf of [the lender] and the transfer of the Mortgage to [another entity], [the plaintiff] has no basis to challenge the Assignment,” and citing cases
• agreeing “with those [district] courts in [the Ninth] Circuit and others that have considered and rejected [the] argument that Fannie Mae is a government actor by virtue of the FHFA conservatorship”
• “The Court agrees with those courts in this Circuit and others that have considered and rejected Plaintiff’s argument that Fannie Mae is a government actor by virtue of the FHFA conservatorship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).