Baldrich v. Barbour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \Congress intended to preempt state laws providing alternate enforcement mechanisms for employees to obtain ERISA plan benefits\
• noting that “Congress intended to preempt state laws providing alternate enforcement mechanisms for employees to obtain ERISA plan benefits”
• holding that \[t]he fact that the Pension Fund is subject to ERISA is of no consequence to its common law fraud claim ... [because in bringing the claim] the Pension Fund is simply in the role of an investor allegedly wronged.\
• rejecting preemption argument where “the Pension Fund is simply in the role of an investor allegedly wronged”
• permitting claim against non-fiduciaries and non-parties in interest to proceed on a fraudulent misrepresentation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).