Baldree v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming exclusion of expert testimony on eyewitness identification because defendant did not show that expert’s “opinions related to any of the specific facts of this case” or could assist the jury “other than in the most general sense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).