Baldoria v. SECURITY REALTY INV. INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where neither party recovered against the other no prevailing party existed for purposes of awarding contractual prevailing party attorney's fees
• “Here, neither buyer nor seller recovered against the other. As there was no prevailing party as between the parties to the contract, the trial court correctly denied attorney’s fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lasco Enterprises, Inc. v. Kohlbrand
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-03· cited 20×
• Franzen v. Lacuna Golf Ltd. Partnership
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-09· cited 10×
• BIRD LAKES DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. Raskin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-17· cited 4×
• Tarr v. Honea
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-20· cited 3×
• Sanchez v. Braun & May Realty, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-22· cited 1×
• McCaughan Mortgage Co. v. American National Bank
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-22· cited 1×
• Schumacher Properties, Inc. v. Rellinger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-21· cited 1×
• Kenmort Properties v. Emergency Services 24, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-06-25