Skip to main content
· 10/28/1985

Balboa Insurance Company v. The United States

Citations

  • 775 F.2d 1158
  • 9 Cl. Ct. 1158
  • 33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,051
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that a surety could maintain an action against the government to recover an allegedly improper progress payment after the surety notified the government of the contractor’s default
  • concluding that “a surety, as [a] bondholder is as much a party to the [g]overnment contract as the contractor” and so may be sued by the gov- ernment
  • holding that a surety bond “creates a three-party relationship, in which the surety becomes liable for the principal’s debt or duty to the third party obligee (here, the government).”
  • noting that the subrogation claim arises \upon notification by the surety of the unsatisfied claims of the material-men\
  • identifying eight factors considered “to be important in determining whether the Government has exercised reasonable discretion in distributing funds”
  • characterizing a surety as a three-party agreement whereby the principal becomes liable for the debt of an obligor to an obligee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Kashiwa, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.