Balbir Brar Associates, Inc. v. Consolidated Trading & Services Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• eiting Smith v. Ware, 244 Va. 374, 421 S.E.2d 444, 445 (1992)
• applying FRCP 13 to determine whether the plaintiff should have brought his state causes of action as compulsory counterclaims in the previous federal court action but finding that the causes of action did not qualify as compulsory counterclaims under the rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).