Balbach v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that previous 15 version of Rule 83.1(a)(3), which provided that “[a] corporation may only be represented by counsel” was “clear and unqualified”
• recognizing that previous version of Rule 83.1(a)(3), which provided that “[a] corporation may only be represented by counsel” was “clear and unqualified”
• “A pro se plaintiff cannot represent a corporation ... The Court cannot waive this rule, even for cases of severe financial hardship.” (citing Affourtit v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. at 780)
• “[A] pro se plaintiff cannot represent a. corporation .... The Court cannot waive this rule, even for eases of severe financial hardship.” (citing Affourtit v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. at 780)
• “A pro se plaintiff cannot represent a corporation ... The Court cannot waive this rule, even for cases of severe financial hardship.” (citing Affourtit v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. at 780)
• “A pro se plaintiff cannot represent a corporation ... The Court cannot waive this rule, even for cases of severe financial hardship.” (citing Affourtit v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. at 780)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).