Balance Dynamics Corporation v. Schmitt Industries, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court erred by dismissing individuals for lack of personal jurisdiction on the basis that they acted in their capacity as agents of the corporation
• noting that a presumption of consumer deception applies to a literal falsity claim for damages so long as there is other proof of marketplace damages
• holding jurisdiction over a corporation is insufficient to create jurisdiction over the individual officers of a corporation
• holding jurisdiction over a corporation is insufficient to create jurisdiction over the individual officers of a corporation
• holding “the mere fact that the actions connecting defendants to the state were undertaken in an official rather than personal capacity does not preclude the exercise of personal jurisdiction over those defendants”
• holding “that the mere fact that the actions connecting defendants to the state were undertaken in an official rather than personal capacity does not preclude the exercise of personal jurisdictional over those defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).