Balagtas v. Merit Systems Protection Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that substantial evidence, including opinions that Plaintiff had limitations for prolonged sitting, standing, and walking, supported an RFC for the full range of sedentary work
• upholding ALJ’s determination that the plaintiff’s obesity was not a severe impairment, even where the medical reports diagnosed the plaintiff with obesity, because those records “provide[d] no evidence of severe impairment limiting work ability”
• no error where ALJ considered only three of seven regulatory factors
• no error where ALJ considered only three of seven regulatory factors
• no error where ALJ considered only three of seven regulatory factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).