Balachandran Rajaratnam v. A.D. Moyer, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that motion for attorney’s fees referred via 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) required de novo review
• finding that motion for attorney’s fees referred via 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) required de novo review
• finding that under the EAJA an “application for fees cannot be characterized as nondispositive”
• the “additional duties” provision of § 636 “does not permit the magistrate judge to enter a final decision appealable to [the Seventh Circuit]”
• “The application for fees cannot be characterized as nondispositive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).